The PDA Enigma: Unravelling the Paradox
- Amelia Loveland
- Sep 16, 2025
- 6 min read
Updated: Dec 17, 2025
Understanding the Need for Autonomy
The Foundational Concepts of PDA
Core Characteristics of PDA
Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA), also referred to as Extreme Demand Avoidance (EDA), is a complex behavioural profile widely understood to occur within the autism spectrum and other neurodivergent presentations (Truman et al., 2024).
First conceptualised by Professor Elizabeth Newson in the 1980s, PDA describes an obsessive, anxiety-driven resistance to everyday demands that goes beyond typical noncompliance (O’Nions et al., 2018; Philippe, 2022). This resistance represents an unconscious, pervasive effort to avoid perceived social or daily expectations, even those the individual may want or need to fulfil (O’Nions et al., 2016).
At its core, PDA manifests as a neurobiological drive for autonomy and self-determination—an instinctive effort to restore balance in environments perceived as threatening or out of control (O’Nions et al., 2021).
This drive distinguishes PDA from simple oppositional behaviour through several key characteristics:
Strategic Social Avoidance
Individuals employ creative tactics, including distraction, excuse-making, or socially provocative behaviour to deflect demands (O’Nions et al., 2016; Philippe, 2022). This strategic use of social behaviours represents a sophisticated, albeit maladaptive, coping mechanism.
Surface Sociability
Many individuals with PDA demonstrate apparent social competence, mimicking neurotypical behaviours to navigate social situations (Egan et al., 2019; O’Nions et al., 2021). This “masking” can obscure underlying social communication challenges and delay appropriate support.
Extreme Emotional Lability
PDA is characterised by intense mood swings, high impulsivity, and rapid escalation when faced with demands (Goodson, 2018; O’Nions et al., 2016). These responses often reflect underlying anxiety and emotion-regulation difficulties rather than willful defiance.
Contextual Variability
Behaviour often varies significantly across settings and relationships, with greater compliance observed in familiar or negotiable environments (O’Nions et al., 2021; White et al., 2023).
The Neurobiological Foundation
Recent research has identified several neurobiological mechanisms underlying PDA behaviours. Intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety serve as primary explanatory frameworks for extreme demand avoidance (Stuart et al., 2020). Studies demonstrate that both autistic traits and anxiety independently predict demand-avoidant behaviours, supporting a model where ASD predisposition interacts with anxiety-related processes (White et al., 2023).
The stress response system plays a crucial role in PDA manifestations. When faced with demands, individuals may experience a fight-or-flight response, triggering avoidance behaviours as a protective mechanism (Lim et al., 2024). This neurobiological understanding has important implications for intervention approaches, suggesting that anxiety reduction strategies may be more effective than traditional compliance-based methods.
The Hyperfocus Paradox
Understanding Hyperfocus in PDA
The relationship between PDA and hyperfocus presents a fascinating paradox. While individuals with PDA demonstrate extreme avoidance of externally imposed demands, they may simultaneously exhibit intense focus and engagement with self-selected activities (Ashinoff & Abu-Akel, 2021). This selective attention pattern reflects the fundamental need for autonomy that characterises PDA.
Hyperfocus in PDA contexts typically occurs when:
The individual maintains complete control over the activity
No external demands or expectations are perceived
The activity aligns with personal interests or provides emotional regulation
The environment feels safe and predictable
The Autonomy-Engagement Connection
Research suggests that the quality of engagement differs significantly between demanded and chosen activities in PDA individuals (Hupfeld et al., 2019). When autonomy is preserved, the same neurological systems that drive demand avoidance can facilitate deep, sustained attention. This paradox highlights the importance of choice and control in supporting optimal functioning.
The implications extend beyond academic or therapeutic settings. Understanding this paradox can inform educational approaches, workplace accommodations, and family dynamics to harness strengths while respecting neurobiological needs (Newson, 2003).
Clinical and Practical Implications
Assessment and Recognition
Current research indicates that PDA frequently co-occurs with autism spectrum conditions, with many high-PDA individuals meeting ASD criteria (O’Nions et al., 2016). However, traditional autism assessments may not adequately capture PDA characteristics, necessitating specialised evaluation approaches that consider demand avoidance patterns, anxiety responses, and the need for control (Green et al., 2018).
Key assessment considerations include:
Observation across multiple contexts and relationships
Assessment of anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty
Evaluation of executive function and emotion regulation
Documentation of response patterns to different demand presentation styles
Intervention Approaches
Evidence-based interventions for PDA emphasise low-demand, flexible approaches that prioritise autonomy and choice (“Pathological Demand Avoidance,” n.d.). Traditional behavioural interventions focused on compliance may be counterproductive, potentially increasing anxiety and avoidance behaviours (Fidler & Christie, 2019).
Effective strategies include:
Collaborative Planning: Involving individuals in decision-making processes
Flexible Demands: Presenting expectations as choices or suggestions rather than commands
Anxiety Management: Addressing underlying anxiety through appropriate therapeutic interventions
Environmental Modifications: Creating predictable, low-stress environments that support self-regulation
Supporting Hyperfocus Tendencies
Rather than viewing hyperfocus as problematic, interventions can leverage these tendencies to support learning and development (Doyle, 2020). This involves:
Identifying and incorporating special interests into educational or therapeutic activities
Allowing natural attention cycles rather than imposing arbitrary time limits
Using hyperfocus periods for skill development and confidence building
Creating bridges between areas of intense interest and necessary life skills
Future Directions and Research Needs
Current research on PDA remains limited, with most studies relying on clinical observations and parent reports rather than controlled empirical investigations (Gillberg, 2010).
Future research priorities include:
Longitudinal studies examining PDA presentations across development
Neuroimaging research to identify specific neural circuits involved in demand avoidance
Intervention studies comparing different therapeutic approaches
Investigation of genetic and environmental factors contributing to PDA development
The relationship between PDA and hyperfocus also requires further investigation to understand how these seemingly contradictory patterns can coexist and be therapeutically leveraged (Kildahl et al., 2021).
Conclusion
The PDA paradox—extreme demand avoidance coupled with potential for intense hyperfocus—reflects the complex interplay between autonomy, anxiety, and attention in neurodivergent individuals. Understanding this paradox is essential for developing effective support strategies that honour neurobiological differences while promoting optimal functioning and well-being.
Recognition of PDA as a distinct profile within the autism spectrum, supported by growing empirical evidence, represents an essential advancement in neurodevelopmental understanding. As research continues to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying PDA, interventions can become increasingly targeted and effective.
The key insight from current research is clear: approaches that preserve autonomy and reduce anxiety are more likely to support positive outcomes than traditional compliance-based interventions.
This understanding has profound implications for educational systems, clinical practice, and family support approaches.
Linked Posts
References
Ashinoff, B. K., & Abu-Akel, A. (2021). Hyperfocus: The forgotten frontier of attention. Psychological Research, 85(1), 1–19.
Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021
Egan, V., Linenberg, O., & O’Nions, E. (2019). The Measurement of Adult Pathological Demand Avoidance Traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(2), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3722-7
Fidler, R., & Christie, P. (2019). Collaborative approaches to learning for pupils with PDA: Strategies for education professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Gillberg, C. (2010). The ESSENCE in child psychiatry: Early Symptomatic Syndromes Eliciting Neurodevelopmental Clinical Examinations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1543–1551.
Goodson, A. (2018). Emotion Regulation and Executive Function in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Pathological Demand Avoidance Traits [Doctoral, UCL (University College London)]. In Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London).
Green, J., Absoud, M., Grahame, V., Malik, O., Simonoff, E., Le Couteur, A., & Baird, G. (2018). Pathological Demand Avoidance: Symptoms but not a syndrome. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(6), 455–464.
Hupfeld, K. E., Abagis, T. R., & Shah, P. (2019). Living “in the zone”: Hyperfocus in adult ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 11(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0272-y
Kildahl, A. N., Helverschou, S. B., Rysstad, A. L., Wigaard, E., Hellerud, J. M., Ludvigsen, L. B., & Howlin, P. (2021). Pathological demand avoidance in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Autism, 25(8), 2162–2176.
Lim, R., Yip, J., & Richardson, A. (2024). Parental experiences in the use of fluoxetine for management of ‘disruptive behaviours’ in children and youth with autism and pathological demand avoidance – a mixed methods exploratory study (Fluoxetine study). In Review.
Newson, E. (2003). Pathological demand avoidance syndrome: A necessary distinction within the pervasive developmental disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88(7), 595–600.
O’Nions, E., Gould, J., Christie, P., Gillberg, C., Viding, E., & Happé, F. (2016). Identifying features of ‘pathological demand avoidance’ using the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders (DISCO). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(4), 407–419.
O’Nions, E., Happé, F., Viding, E., & Noens, I. (2021). Extreme Demand Avoidance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Refinement of a Caregiver-Report Measure. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5(3), 269–281.
O’Nions, E., Viding, E., Floyd, C., Quinlan, E., Pidgeon, C., Gould, J., & Happé, F. (2018). Dimensions of difficulty in children reported to have an autism spectrum diagnosis and features of extreme/‘pathological’ demand avoidance. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 23(3), 220–227.
Moore, A. (2020). Pathological demand avoidance: What and who are being pathologised and in whose interests? Global Studies of Childhood, 10(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619890070
Philippe, A. (2022). Alternatives to Gold Standard Diagnostic Tools for Distinguishing “Natural Kinds” on the Autism Spectrum. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 862410. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.862410
Stuart, L., Grahame, V., Honey, E., & Freeston, M. (2020). Intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety as explanatory frameworks for extreme demand avoidance in children and adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 25(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12336
Truman, C., Crane, L., Howlin, P., & Pellicano, E. (2024). The educational experiences of autistic children with and without extreme demand avoidance behaviours. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916108
White, R., Livingston, L. A., Taylor, E. C., Close, S. A. D., Shah, P., & Callan, M. J. (2023). Understanding the Contributions of Trait Autism and Anxiety to Extreme Demand Avoidance in the Adult General Population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(7), 2680–2688.
Comments