Why the Labels Matter
- Amelia Loveland
- Sep 18, 2025
- 8 min read
Updated: Dec 16, 2025
The Life-Changing Power of Neurodivergent Diagnosis
In a world increasingly recognising neurodiversity as natural human variation, the question of formal diagnosis remains contentious. Yet for millions of autistic, ADHD, and otherwise neurodivergent individuals, receiving a diagnostic label represents far more than medical categorisation—it becomes a gateway to understanding, community, and essential support.
Beyond Pathology: Reframing Diagnosis in the Neurodiversity Era
The neurodiversity paradigm, pioneered by autistic sociologist Judy Singer in the 1990s, fundamentally challenges traditional medical approaches to neurological differences (Singer, 1998). Rather than viewing autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and related conditions as disorders requiring cure, this framework positions neurodivergence as valuable human diversity—akin to variations in culture, ethnicity, or sexuality (Kapp et al., 2013).
This shift from deficit to difference creates a profound paradox. While advocating for acceptance of neurological variation, neurodivergent individuals must still navigate systems requiring diagnostic labels to access support. The diagnosis transforms from a marker of pathology into a tool of empowerment, unlocking accommodations, therapies, and legal protections in a world not yet designed for neurological diversity (Singer, 2017).
The language we use matters immensely. Identity-first terminology—"autistic person" rather than "person with autism"—reflects this paradigm shift, acknowledging neurodivergence as an integral aspect of identity rather than an external affliction (Bottema-Beutel et al., 2021). This linguistic choice represents a fundamental statement about belonging and worth.
The Psychological Liberation of Understanding
For many neurodivergent individuals, diagnosis brings profound psychological relief. After years of struggling to understand why they think, feel, or behave differently, a diagnostic explanation reframes their entire life narrative. Instead of personal failings, their challenges are understood as neurological differences that require different approaches (Lewis, 2016).
This transformation is particularly significant for those who have spent years "masking"—consciously suppressing neurodivergent traits to appear neurotypical. Research demonstrates that chronic masking contributes directly to anxiety, depression, and burnout, creating what many describe as a complete disconnection from their authentic selves (Hull et al., 2017). Diagnosis provides permission to unmask, beginning a journey toward self-acceptance and authentic living.
The hereditary nature of neurodivergence adds another layer of complexity. With heritability estimates of 70-90% for autism and 70-80% for ADHD, diagnosis often triggers recognition of neurodivergent traits throughout family systems (Lichtenstein et al., 2010; Rabba et al., 2019). Many parents discover their own neurodivergence through their children's diagnostic journeys, creating opportunities for multigenerational healing and understanding.
The Critical Window: Why Early Diagnosis Matters
The timing of diagnosis profoundly impacts outcomes, particularly during childhood when brain plasticity remains at its peak. Early intervention leverages this neuroplasticity to support skill development and adaptive strategies during critical developmental periods (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2015).
However, diagnostic practices remain biased toward presentations seen in cisgender boys, leading to systematic underdiagnosis of girls, women, and gender-diverse individuals. While commonly cited ratios suggest autism affects four males for every female, emerging research indicates the actual figure may be closer to 2:1 as understanding of diverse presentations improves (McCrossin, 2022).
Early diagnosis enables families to understand their child's needs, implement appropriate accommodations, and connect with supportive communities. Children receiving timely support demonstrate improved academic outcomes, better social skills development, and lower rates of secondary mental health challenges than those diagnosed later (Fernell et al., 2013; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2015).
The Devastating Cost of Missed Diagnosis
Conversely, undiagnosed neurodivergence creates cascading negative consequences across the lifespan. Without understanding their neurological differences, individuals face higher rates of anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and social difficulties (French et al., 2025; Lai et al., 2019). The chronic stress of navigating an incompatible world without support contributes to what researchers term "autistic burnout"—a state of profound exhaustion requiring extended recovery periods.
Academic and professional underachievement represents another significant consequence. Neurodivergent students without appropriate support may be perceived as lazy or defiant, developing negative associations with learning that persist throughout life. In workplaces, undiagnosed employees struggle with social dynamics, sensory environments, and communication expectations, often leading to frequent job changes or underemployment despite significant capabilities (Hull et al., 2017).
The problem extends beyond individual experiences to systemic failures. Diagnostic criteria developed primarily from observations of white, middle-class boys fail to capture the diversity of neurodivergent presentations, particularly among women, people of colour, and those from different cultural backgrounds (Dworzynski et al., 2012; Mandell et al., 2009). These biases perpetuate inequalities in access to diagnosis and support.
Unlocking Support and Building Community
A formal diagnosis is a critical step that grants access to necessary supports and services. In Australia, diagnosis enables access to National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funding, Medicare rebates for therapeutic services, and Centrelink benefits for individuals and carers (Dickinson & Yates, 2023; National Disability Insurance Scheme Act, 2013). These financial supports can be transformative, providing access to speech therapy, occupational therapy, psychological support, and educational accommodations.
Legal protections under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 ensure neurodivergent individuals can request reasonable adjustments in educational and workplace settings (Disability Discrimination Act, 1992). These might include quiet workspaces, flexible scheduling, assistive technology, or modified assessment formats — accommodations that level the playing field rather than providing unfair advantages (Lindsay et al., 2018).
Perhaps most importantly, diagnosis facilitates connection to neurodivergent communities. These connections combat isolation while providing practical strategies, emotional support, and positive role models. Online and in-person communities offer spaces where neurodivergent individuals can share experiences, celebrate differences, and advocate collectively for systemic change (Crane et al., 2019; Crompton et al., 2020).
Navigating Debates and Moving Forward
The neurodiversity movement continues evolving, with ongoing debates about the balance between celebrating differences and acknowledging genuine support needs. Critics worry that emphasising neurodivergence as merely a difference minimises the significant challenges faced by those who require high levels of support (Jaarsma & Welin, 2012; Singer, 2017). However, advocates argue that embracing neurodiversity doesn't mean refusing necessary support—instead, it means ensuring interventions enhance quality of life while respecting individual autonomy and identity (Leadbitter et al., 2021).
The goal is neuro-affirmative support that helps individuals thrive as their authentic selves rather than forcing conformity to neurotypical expectations. This approach prioritises communication enhancement, skill development, and environmental modifications while rejecting interventions aimed at eliminating neurodivergent traits(Bottema-Beutel et al., 2021; Pellicano & Den Houting, 2022)].
Conclusion: Labels as Tools of Liberation
In our journey toward a truly neurodiverse-affirming society, diagnostic labels remain essential tools rather than barriers. While we work toward a future where differences are universally accepted and accommodated, diagnosis provides immediate access to understanding, support, and community for neurodivergent individuals and their families.
The imperative is clear: we must improve diagnostic practices to be more accessible, accurate, and culturally responsive while simultaneously building systems that value neurodivergent contributions. For neurodivergent individuals seeking clarity about their experiences, diagnosis offers not limitation but liberation—a pathway to authentic living in a world still learning to embrace the full spectrum of human neurological diversity.
The labels matter because they provide language for experiences previously unnamed, community for those feeling isolated, and access to support in systems not yet redesigned for inclusion. In recognising this, we honour both the reality of current barriers and the vision of future acceptance, ensuring no neurodivergent individual navigates their journey alone.
Linked Posts
References
Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0014
Crane, L., Adams, F., Harper, G., Welch, J., & Pellicano, E. (2019). ‘Something needs to change’: Mental health experiences of young autistic adults in England. Autism, 23(2), 477–493.
Crompton, C. J., Hallett, S., Ropar, D., Flynn, E., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2020). ‘I never realised everybody felt as happy as I do when I am around autistic people’: A thematic analysis of autistic adults’ relationships with autistic and neurotypical friends and family. Autism, 24(6), 1438–1448.
Dickinson, H., & Yates, S. (2023). A decade on: The achievements and challenges of the National Disability Insurance Scheme’s implementation. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 460–475.
Disability Discrimination Act, Cth (1992).
Dworzynski, K., Ronald, A., Bolton, P., & Happé, F. (2012). How Different Are Girls and Boys Above and Below the Diagnostic Threshold for Autism Spectrum Disorders? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(8), 788–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.018
Fernell, E., Eriksson, & Gillberg, C. (2013). Early diagnosis of autism and impact on prognosis: A narrative review. Clinical Epidemiology, 33. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S41714
French, B., Wright, H., Daley, D., Perez Vallejos, E., Sayal, K., & Hall, C. L. (2025). Evaluation and Uptake of an Online ADHD Psychoeducation Training for Primary Care Health Care Professionals: Implementation Study. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e59365. https://doi.org/10.2196/59365
Hull, L., Petrides, K. V., Allison, C., Smith, P., Baron-Cohen, S., Lai, M. C., & Mandy, W. (2017). Putting on my best normal“: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2519–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5
Jaarsma, P., & Welin, S. (2012). Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement. Health Care Analysis, 20(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9
Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353
Lai, M.-C., Kassee, C., Besney, R., Bonato, S., Hull, L., Mandy, W., Szatmari, P., & Ameis, S. H. (2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5
Leadbitter, K., Buckle, K. L., Ellis, C., & Dekker, M. (2021). Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 635690.
Lewis, L. F. (2016). Realizing a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder as an adult. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 25(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12200
Lichtenstein, P., Carlström, E., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., & Anckarsäter, H. (2010). The Genetics of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Childhood. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(11), 1357–1363. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020223
Lindsay, S., Cagliostro, E., & Carafa, G. (2018). A systematic review of workplace disclosure and accommodation requests among youth and young adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(25), 2971–2986.
Mandell, D. S., Wiggins, L. D., Carpenter, L. A., Daniels, J., DiGuiseppi, C., Durkin, M. S., Giarelli, E., Morrier, M. J., Nicholas, J. S., Pinto-Martin, J. A., Shattuck, P. T., Thomas, K. C., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., & Kirby, R. S. (2009). Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Identification of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. American Journal of Public Health, 99(3), 493–498.
McCrossin, R. (2022). Finding the True Number of Females with Autistic Spectrum Disorder by Estimating the Biases in Initial Recognition and Clinical Diagnosis. Children, 9(2), 272.
National Disability Insurance Scheme Act, Cth (2013).
Pellicano, E., & Den Houting, J. (2022). Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534
Rabba, A. S., Dissanayake, C., & Barbaro, J. (2019). Parents’ experiences of an early autism diagnosis: Insights into their needs. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 66, 101415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101415
Singer, J. (1998). Odd people in: The birth of community amongst people on the autistic spectrum: A personal exploration of a new social movement based on neurological diversity. Sydney: Faculty of Humanities and Social Science University of Technology, Sydney.
Singer, J. (2017). NeuroDiversity: The birth of an idea. Verlag nicht ermittelbar.
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bauman, M. L., Choueiri, R., Kasari, C., Carter, A., Granpeesheh, D., Mailloux, Z., Smith Roley, S., Wagner, S., Fein, D., Pierce, K., Buie, T., Davis, P. A., Newschaffer, C., Robins, D., Wetherby, A., Stone, W. L., Yirmiya, N., Estes, A., … Natowicz, M. R. (2015). Early Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Under 3 Years of Age: Recommendations for Practice and Research. Pediatrics, 136(Supplement_1), S60–S81.
Comments